Feb 26, 2013 Replies: 14 Windows Startup Settings (including safe mode) - Microsoft Windows Help Delivering fast boot times in Windows 8 - Building Windows 8 - Site Home - MSDN Blogs Last edited: Dec 29, 2013 Click to expand...
Windows Startup Settings (including safe mode) - Microsoft Windows Help Delivering fast boot times in Windows 8 - Building Windows 8 - Site Home - MSDN Blogs
LilBambi BSOD Kernel Dump Senior Analyst Joined Apr 17, 2012 Posts 292 Location Virgina, USA Feb 26, 2013 #2 Microsoft changed things up quite a bit in terminology, and how to find things. Sometimes I wonder about the wisdom of so many changes of that magnitude.
Microsoft changed things up quite a bit in terminology, and how to find things. Sometimes I wonder about the wisdom of so many changes of that magnitude.
jcgriff2 Co-Founder / AdminBSOD Instructor/ExpertMicrosoft MVP (Ret.) Staff member Joined Feb 19, 2012 Posts 21,541 Location New Jersey Shore Feb 26, 2013 #3 Special thanks goes to Mike (writhziden) who told me about this -- after I instructed a Windows 8 OP to boot into SAFEMODE! :)
Special thanks goes to Mike (writhziden) who told me about this -- after I instructed a Windows 8 OP to boot into SAFEMODE! :)
LilBambi BSOD Kernel Dump Senior Analyst Joined Apr 17, 2012 Posts 292 Location Virgina, USA Feb 26, 2013 #4 Awesome! Learn by doing! It's the only way to fly!
AceInfinity Emeritus, Contributor Joined Feb 21, 2012 Posts 1,728 Location Canada Feb 27, 2013 #5 The thing here to note is that you essentially don't get Safe Mode because of UEFI or "Secure boot", thus no traditional F8 key on boot to get to where you want to be. You have to disable UEFI boot in order for the original stuff to work.
The thing here to note is that you essentially don't get Safe Mode because of UEFI or "Secure boot", thus no traditional F8 key on boot to get to where you want to be. You have to disable UEFI boot in order for the original stuff to work.
jcgriff2 Co-Founder / AdminBSOD Instructor/ExpertMicrosoft MVP (Ret.) Staff member Joined Feb 19, 2012 Posts 21,541 Location New Jersey Shore Feb 27, 2013 #6 PIA nonetheless. I often boot into safemode to copy files out or do other tasks that run 10x faster in safemode v. normal Windows.
PIA nonetheless. I often boot into safemode to copy files out or do other tasks that run 10x faster in safemode v. normal Windows.
AceInfinity Emeritus, Contributor Joined Feb 21, 2012 Posts 1,728 Location Canada Feb 27, 2013 #7 jcgriff2 said: PIA nonetheless. I often boot into safemode to copy files out or do other tasks that run 10x faster in safemode v. normal Windows. Click to expand... Other way is to take a trip to the past and morph your computer's visual into Windows 2000 by disabling all the effects. :lol: My resource heavy perl scripts run much faster when I do this too.
jcgriff2 said: PIA nonetheless. I often boot into safemode to copy files out or do other tasks that run 10x faster in safemode v. normal Windows. Click to expand... Other way is to take a trip to the past and morph your computer's visual into Windows 2000 by disabling all the effects. :lol: My resource heavy perl scripts run much faster when I do this too.
jcgriff2 Co-Founder / AdminBSOD Instructor/ExpertMicrosoft MVP (Ret.) Staff member Joined Feb 19, 2012 Posts 21,541 Location New Jersey Shore Feb 27, 2013 #8 That is a far worse option for me, Ace! I guess I got spoiled -- Vista being my 1st Windows OS. Prior to that, Windows was used solely to get me out to mainframe-land of tax & law DBs.
That is a far worse option for me, Ace! I guess I got spoiled -- Vista being my 1st Windows OS. Prior to that, Windows was used solely to get me out to mainframe-land of tax & law DBs.
AceInfinity Emeritus, Contributor Joined Feb 21, 2012 Posts 1,728 Location Canada Feb 27, 2013 #9 I'm a programmer, so personally I love the Windows 2000 look for some reason :lol:. If I was a pure graphics designer, things may be different for my preferences haha.
I'm a programmer, so personally I love the Windows 2000 look for some reason :lol:. If I was a pure graphics designer, things may be different for my preferences haha.
Anthony N Well-known member Joined Jun 13, 2012 Posts 619 Location Michigan, USA Mar 1, 2013 #10 AceInfinity said: I'm a programmer, so personally I love the Windows 2000 look for some reason :lol:. Click to expand... Syntax and code my friend :) I'd never give up aero, EVER.
AceInfinity said: I'm a programmer, so personally I love the Windows 2000 look for some reason :lol:. Click to expand... Syntax and code my friend :) I'd never give up aero, EVER.
AceInfinity Emeritus, Contributor Joined Feb 21, 2012 Posts 1,728 Location Canada Mar 1, 2013 #11 Anthony N said: AceInfinity said: I'm a programmer, so personally I love the Windows 2000 look for some reason :lol:. Click to expand... Syntax and code my friend :) I'd never give up aero, EVER. Click to expand... If you were a sole programmer you'd understand the beauty of Windows 2000 as a visual :lol: It's the same thing for people that prefer CLI over GUI haha.
Anthony N said: AceInfinity said: I'm a programmer, so personally I love the Windows 2000 look for some reason :lol:. Click to expand... Syntax and code my friend :) I'd never give up aero, EVER. Click to expand... If you were a sole programmer you'd understand the beauty of Windows 2000 as a visual :lol: It's the same thing for people that prefer CLI over GUI haha.
LilBambi BSOD Kernel Dump Senior Analyst Joined Apr 17, 2012 Posts 292 Location Virgina, USA Mar 1, 2013 #12 Function over form eh? I love Aero and Windows 7! I love Mac OS X's beautiful GUI as well. I love KDE and Xfce for Linux as well. But I certainly love my CLI very much!
Function over form eh? I love Aero and Windows 7! I love Mac OS X's beautiful GUI as well. I love KDE and Xfce for Linux as well. But I certainly love my CLI very much!
jcgriff2 Co-Founder / AdminBSOD Instructor/ExpertMicrosoft MVP (Ret.) Staff member Joined Feb 19, 2012 Posts 21,541 Location New Jersey Shore Mar 2, 2013 #13 Anthony N said: I'd never give up aero, EVER. Click to expand... Glad to know I am not alone!!! LilBambi said: Function over form eh? I love Aero and Windows 7! I love Mac OS X's beautiful GUI as well. I love KDE and Xfce for Linux as well. But I certainly love my CLI very much! Click to expand... As long as "function" includes Aero Glass. :)
Anthony N said: I'd never give up aero, EVER. Click to expand... Glad to know I am not alone!!! LilBambi said: Function over form eh? I love Aero and Windows 7! I love Mac OS X's beautiful GUI as well. I love KDE and Xfce for Linux as well. But I certainly love my CLI very much! Click to expand... As long as "function" includes Aero Glass. :)
AceInfinity Emeritus, Contributor Joined Feb 21, 2012 Posts 1,728 Location Canada Mar 2, 2013 #14 jcgriff2 said: As long as "function" includes Aero Glass. :) Click to expand... :lol: Funny guy
LilBambi BSOD Kernel Dump Senior Analyst Joined Apr 17, 2012 Posts 292 Location Virgina, USA Mar 3, 2013 #15 jcgriff2 said: Anthony N said: I'd never give up aero, EVER. Click to expand... Glad to know I am not alone!!! LilBambi said: Function over form eh? I love Aero and Windows 7! I love Mac OS X's beautiful GUI as well. I love KDE and Xfce for Linux as well. But I certainly love my CLI very much! Click to expand... As long as "function" includes Aero Glass. :) Click to expand... Yes! Windows without Aero Glass these days really stinks.
jcgriff2 said: Anthony N said: I'd never give up aero, EVER. Click to expand... Glad to know I am not alone!!! LilBambi said: Function over form eh? I love Aero and Windows 7! I love Mac OS X's beautiful GUI as well. I love KDE and Xfce for Linux as well. But I certainly love my CLI very much! Click to expand... As long as "function" includes Aero Glass. :) Click to expand... Yes! Windows without Aero Glass these days really stinks.