Has anyone else experienced a slower runtime with 2.5.3.3 than with 2.5.1.4?
I have received a few messages about that being the case, and was hoping some others might do some beta testing to determine if they are also seeing that behavior.
Run the same .dmps for 2-3 runs with each version using the same settings for each, and report back the time that is given in the final window.
I am unable to replicate it myself. Here are my settings: View attachment 46.zip (save yours before loading mine)
So far what I have found on my two systems with kernel debugger 6.2.9200.16384:
I have received a few messages about that being the case, and was hoping some others might do some beta testing to determine if they are also seeing that behavior.
Run the same .dmps for 2-3 runs with each version using the same settings for each, and report back the time that is given in the final window.
I am unable to replicate it myself. Here are my settings: View attachment 46.zip (save yours before loading mine)
So far what I have found on my two systems with kernel debugger 6.2.9200.16384:
Code:
Laptop: Intel i7-2670QM @ 2.20 GHz (60 .dmps)
2.5.3.3 718.787 s 670.384 s 680.567 s
2.5.1.4 743.999 s 745.177 s 756.013 s
Desktop: Intel Q9550 @ 2.83 GHz (60 .dmps)
2.5.3.3 683.281 s 659.370 s
2.5.1.4 691.148 s 749.411 s
Laptop: VirtualBox Windows XP (60 .dmps)
2.5.3.3 946.021 s 1085.04 s 1066.72 s
2.5.1.4 1066.262 s 1249.68 s 1242.17 s
Laptop: VirtualBox Windows 7 (60 .dmps)
2.5.3.3 1265.96 s 1266.90 s
2.5.1.4 1318.44 s 1492.80 s
2nd Laptop: Intel Core 2 T5300 @ 1.73 GHz (60 .dmps)
2.5.3.3 1729.93 s 1366.15 s
2.5.1.4 2348.10 s 2243.33 s
Last edited: