How Microsoft dragged its development practices into the 21st century

JMH

Emeritus, Contributor
Joined
Apr 2, 2012
Posts
7,197
For the longest time, Microsoft had something of a poor reputation as a software developer. The issue wasn't so much the quality of the company's software but the way it was developed and delivered. The company's traditional model involved cranking out a new major version of Office, Windows, SQL Server, Exchange, and so on every three or so years.

The releases may have been infrequent, but delays, or at least perceived delays, were not. Microsoft's reputation in this regard never quite matched the reality—the company tended to shy away from making any official announcements of when something would ship until such a point as the company knew it would hit the date—but leaks, assumptions, and speculation were routine. Windows 95 was late. Windows 2000 was late. Windows Vista was very late and only came out after the original software was scrapped.
How Microsoft dragged its development practices into the 21st century | Ars Technica
 

Has Sysnative Forums helped you? Please consider donating to help us support the site!

Back
Top