1. #1
    satrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    • specs System Specs
      • Motherboard:
        ASRock Z77E-ITX
      • CPU:
        E3-1230 V2 3.3GHz
      • Memory:
        16GB G.Skill DDR3 2400
      • Graphics:
        Asus GTX1060
      • Sound Card:
      • Hard Drives:
        3x250GB SSDs, 2x 2.5 1TB HDD JBOD
      • Power Supply:
        Seasonic 360W Gold
      • Case:
        BitFenix Prodigy Black
      • Cooling:
        Be Quiet Shadow Rock Topflow + 2x case fans
      • Display:
        Dell U2412M 1900x1200 x2 (sometimes x3)
      • Operating System:
        W7 x64 Pro

    Components returns rates (Avoid buying a 'bad' product)

    This is the 6th in a series scrutinizing the returns rates of hardware sold by a French etailer and makes interesting reading. When used alongside the verified reports from NewEgg buyers, for example, this can aid in choosing reliable and stable hardware components.

    Components returns rates (6).
    The one gap in our advice on purchasing of material is information on reliability. Sure, manufacturer reputation helps, but as reliability varies enormously from one model to another, even well-known manufacturers aren’t immune to sending out doubtful products.

    Even though, as the financial sector has taught us, we shouldn‘t rely on past results, today we’re publishing some of the returns stats that we have available. Of course this type of stat is of relative value, especially as a good number of the products have become obsolete. The information is nevertheless useful and allows us to point out certain products or manufacturers that need to do better in the future.

    The first question is of course where the stats come from. They’re taken from a large French etailer, whose database we have had direct access to. We were therefore able to extract the stats we wanted directly from source.

    Under what conditions is a part declared as defective by this etailer? There are two possible cases: either the technician considers the exchange of information with the client (type of problem, cross testing) sufficient to declare that the product isn’t working, or there’s a question mark over the component and the etailer tests it to check if it’s working or not.

    Among the returns that aren’t tested, some of the components announced as having an issue by customers probably aren't actually defective, in spite of the precautions taken by the technician. This is something inherent in the etailing sector and in practice, it’s unlikely that any model or product is more affected by this phenomenon than any other (at least we’re aware of no objective argument that shows this).

    Of course, these statistics are limited to the products sold by this particular etailer and the returns made to it. Sometimes returns are made to the manufacturer itself, particularly with storage, but this represents a minority in the first year.

    There’s no other way of obtaining more reliable statistics and, while not perfect, at least our system allows us to give you some indication of reliability.
    In any case, who would believe any returns rates given by the manufacturers themselves?
    usasma and Britton30 say thanks for this.

    • Ad Bot



  2. #2
    Wrench97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    S.E. Pennsylvania

    Re: Components returns rates (Avoid buying a 'bad' product)

    Interesting article.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-31-2012, 03:40 PM
  2. Facebook rumored to be buying Opera
    By JMH in forum Web Browser News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-26-2012, 05:13 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-23-2012, 03:41 PM

Log in

Log in